Displaying 591 - 600 of 602 results
-
Variation and improving services: case studies and key questionsThe Health Quality & Safety Commission’s Atlas of Healthcare Variation (the Atlas) is a starting point for analysing variation in a local area, and for developing service improvement activities to address variation.
-
Addressing unwarranted variation: literature review on methods for influencing practiceThis literature review focuses on methods used overseas for identifying and reducing unwarranted variation in health care with a view of informing the approach in New Zealand.
-
Variation in medical practice: literature review and discussionThis document, prepared by Sapere Research Group, discusses variation in the way health services are delivered by individual clinicians, and across geographic areas.
-
Variation and improving services: analysing and interpreting variationThe Health Quality & Safety Commission’s Atlas of Healthcare Variation (the Atlas) is a starting point for analysing variation in a local area, and for developing service improvement activities to address variation.
-
Target CLAB Zero final reportThis is the final report on the collaborative to prevent central line associated bacteraemia (CLAB).
-
Development of patient experience indicators for New ZealandKPMG has developed a report on the development of patient experience indicators for New Zealand for the Commission.
-
Annual Report 2012/13 | Pūrongo ā-tau 2012/13The Commission's annual report for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 is available to download below.
-
Describing the quality of New Zealand's health and disability servicesHealth Quality and Safety Indicator report 'Describing the quality of New Zealand's health and disability services'.
-
Annual Report 2011/12 | Pūrongo ā-tau 2011/12The Commission's annual report for the period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 is available to download below.
-
Low speed run over mortality reportIn its Fifth Report to the Minister of Health (2009), the Child and Youth Mortality Review Committee (CYMRC) noted that systems to review non-traffic deaths are inconsistent and less well developed compared with systems to review traffic deaths.