Skip to main content
Alert
This site has not been optimised for Internet Explorer due to Microsoft no longer providing support for the browser. Please view this site using another browser such as Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge.

Polypharmacy in people aged 65 and over

The goal of this Atlas domain is to identify whether there is significant variation in the dispensing rates of long-term medications among people aged 65 and over, that may highlight areas that warrant further local investigation.

Overview

Polypharmacy refers to the concurrent use of multiple medicines by a person. It can be beneficial (appropriate polypharmacy) or harmful (inappropriate polypharmacy).[1]

  • Appropriate polypharmacy has been described as medications that are clinically justified.
  • Inappropriate polypharmacy is the prescribing of medications that are unnecessary, unhelpful or unwanted or have unacceptable side effects or risks. One way to define inappropriate polypharmacy is to look at the number of medicines (five or more medicines is often quoted).[2]

Polypharmacy is associated with: 

  • people not taking medicines as prescribed
  • significant costs to patients and health services
  • adverse drug events and drug interactions that can result in poor health outcomes, such as falls, cognitive impairment, frailty, depression and lower quality of life. 

The risk of adverse drug events increases with the number of medications taken, with an inflexion point at five medications where the risk of side effects accelerates. Polypharmacy is consistently associated with higher rates of medication-related harm, including drug interactions, hospitalisations and poorer health outcomes [3,4].

Polypharmacy is more likely to be appropriate in those aged 65 to 74 while inappropriate polypharmacy is more likely to occur in those aged 85 and over. Hence a focus on the 85 years and over age group may be most appropriate, where the doses used may be as important as the number of medicines. 

Key methodological changes in this update

  • This update uses primary health organisation (PHO) enrolled population aged 65 years and over as the denominator, replacing Stats NZ estimated population projections. As a result, a small proportion of people were excluded from analysis in the interests of having a more tightly defined denominator. For example, approximately 3,600 people were excluded from Indicator 1 (people aged 65 years and over dispensed five or more unique long-term medicines). This represents less than 1 percent of those aged 65 years and over who were dispensed five or more unique medications. 
  • A key change was made to the numerator calculation, to make the approach more consistent with other Atlas methods.

Impact of these changes are listed in the table below:

Indicator Method change Impact of method changes

1. People aged 65 years and over dispensed five or more unique long-term medicines

Previously, the numerator was calculated as the quarterly sum of individuals who received medications in a given quarter and had also been dispensed the same medications in the preceding quarter. This was averaged across four quarters. 

This update counts the distinct number of individuals who received the same medications in two consecutive quarters in a year. Therefore, current figures are not directly comparable with those from the previous update. This change was made to better capture those who may not receive five or more medicines consistently throughout the entire year, and to ensure consistency with other Atlas indicators, where we report medication use on an annual basis rather than as an average.

The dispensing rate of 5+ medications increased from 32.1% in 2019 to 44.4% with the method change. 

Since 2019, this has increased to 46.5% in 2023.

2. People aged 65 years and over dispensed five, six or seven unique long-term medicines The rate in 2019 has increased from 19.2% to 33.1% with the method change. Rates have remained steady since.
3. People aged 65 years and over dispensed eight, nine or ten unique long-term medicines In the previous version the rate was 8.9% in 2019, this has increased to 16.5% with the method change. The rate in 2023 was 17.9%.
4. People aged 65 years and over dispensed 11 or more unique long-term medicines Reported at 4.0% in 2019, this increased to 6.8% with the method change, and to 8.1% in 2023. 
5. People aged 65 years and over who received the ‘triple whammy’ No change to numerator calculation. The reported rate in 2019 was previously 3.2%, it is now 3.4%. In 2023, the rate has reduced to 2.7%.
6. PHO-enrolled population aged 65 years and over who received an antipsychotic during the year The earlier method used a quarterly average of individuals dispensed medications. This update instead counts the distinct number of individuals who received medications in at least one quarter of the calendar year. This is consistent with our usual methodology. Antipsychotic use was 2.9% in 2019, rising to 4.3% with the method change. In 2023, the rate was 4.9%.
7. PHO-enrolled population aged 65 years and over who received a benzodiazepine or zopiclone The rate reported in 2019 was 10.4%, increasing to 17.1% with the method change. The rate in 2023 was reduced slightly to 16.2%.
8. People aged 65 years and over who received both a benzodiazepine or zopiclone and an antipsychotic in the same quarter during the calendar year Reported rates were between 1–1.3% from 2012 to 2019, increasing slightly to 1.8% with the method change. Rates have remained unchanged since.

The methodology report has more information on the indicators, data sources, definitions and rationale we used to gather this data. 

Atlas of Healthcare Variation: Methodology for polypharmacy (PDF 535KB)

Atlas of Healthcare Variation: Methodology for polypharmacy (DOCX 330KB)

What the data tells us

Selected findings from the Atlas are summarised below. For all indicators and detailed commentary, see the Atlas dashboards, where you can search by age, ethnic group, year, and health district.

Explore the polypharmacy map 

What the data tells us

Further reading

Method

Data for this Atlas domain was drawn from the Pharmaceutical Collection, which contains claim and payment information from community pharmacists for subsidised dispensing.  

The data presented does not allow for analysis of patients’ condition or the effectiveness of dose provided. This means it was not possible to assess the appropriateness or otherwise of prescribing. Instead, proxy markers were employed, beginning with a simple count of the number of long-term medicines taken by older people. Unsubsidised or over-the-counter medicines are not included. Data also does not indicate whether people took the medicine.

References

  1. Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation (kingsfund.org.uk)
  2. What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions (pubmedncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  3. Medication safety in polypharmacy: technical report (who.int)
  4. RACGP aged care clinical guide (Silver Book) (racgp.org.au)
  5. NSAIDS and acute kidney injury (medsafe.govt.nz)
  6. Psychotropic Drug-Induced Falls in Older People (link.springer.com)
  7. Psychotropic medication use and future unexplained and injurious falls and fracture amongst community-dwelling older people: data from TILDA (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  8. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry Annual Report 2024 (anzhfr.org)
Published: 29 Oct 2021 Modified: 18 Dec 2025