Te tohu hononga ā-kiritaki kounga
Consumer engagement quality and safety marker
A framework to measure what successful consumer, whānau and community engagement looks like and how it improves the quality and safety of services.
Te tohu hononga ā-kiritaki kounga
A framework to measure what successful consumer, whānau and community engagement looks like and how it improves the quality and safety of services.
The consumer engagement quality and safety marker (QSM) seeks to answer the question, ‘What does successful consumer and whānau engagement look like, and (how) does it improve the quality and safety of services?’.
Please click here to view the consumer engagement QSM.
For 2022/23, the following process applies:
The goal of this QSM is to address ‘what does successful consumer engagement look like, and (how) does it improve the quality and safety of services?
A framework underpinning this QSM has been developed: Supporting, Understanding, Responding and Evaluating (SURE). The SURE framework focuses on four areas:
By completing the form above, you are contributing to the ‘SURE’ framework.
There are three domains to rate:
There are four possible ratings for each domain:
1 – minimal | te itinga iho
2 – consultation | te akoako
3 – involvement | te whai wāhi
4 – partnership & shared leadership | te mahi tahi me te kaiārahitanga ngātahi
Download a detailed description for each rating (132KB, pdf).
To support your rating, there is an opportunity to comment on why a rating was chosen, and upload examples to support this rating. It is important to note that these will be available publicly.
Existing data (including demographic data) from the adult inpatient experience survey and primary care experience survey will be included with the QSM.
It is less important what the final rating is, it is more about understanding where the organisation is so that improvements can be made over time.
The pilot sites have found various ways to collect district-wide information. Each pilot site developed a form or survey to send to different services. These are available directly from the pilot sites. (see ‘buddy system’ under ‘who developed this QSM and how can I access support?’).
It is not essential to focus on every service, and this may not be practical to start with. The pilot sites did find ways to capture this information and can offer advice on how this was achieved. Counties Manukau Health developed a survey and a template for collecting organisation-wide information.
What are the principles behind this QSM?
In the development, maintenance and monitoring of this framework the following principles were developed by the consumer engagement QSM reference group:
The Health Quality & Safety Commission’s understanding of the articles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and how these are applied to our work are described below:
Kāwantanga – partnering and shared decision-making
Our work is informed and shaped equally by tangata whenua and tangata Te Tiriti worldviews and perspectives.
Tino Rangatiratanga – self-determination
We recognise the importance of tangata whenua authority and autonomy. We support tangata whenua led processes, actions and decision making, through sharing power and resources.
Ōritetanga – equity for tangata whenua
We undertake specific actions to ensure equitable outcomes for tangata whenua and we recognise that these actions can also support equitable outcomes for other groups.
Wairuatanga – upholding values, belief systems and worldviews
Tangata whenua worldviews, values and belief systems are prioritised in our work.
This QSM was developed in partnership with a QSM reference group and the Commission. The four pilot sites were Counties Manukau Health, Waitematā, Waikato and Canterbury. Please contact qsm@hqsc.govt.nz for further support.
It is possible to provide up to five examples as supporting documentation for the chosen rating. There is also ‘free text’ available to describe the rating.
If the file size is too large, there is provision to upload larger files to a file-sharing service. All uploads are stored locally. For more information contact: qsm@hqsc.govt.nz.
Co-design is an important part of a process to identify a challenge or opportunity to engage people, consumers, whānau, family and staff; to capture their experiences and ideas; to organise the learning to create new understanding and insight from the perspective of the care and emotional journey; to stay together in partnership to review learning and ideas; to plan and implement improvements; and, finally, to review the difference made (adapted from Dr Lynne Maher, Principal Co-design Counties Manukau, presentation, 2020).
Co-design is often used as an umbrella term for participatory, co-creation and open design processes. Key components of a co-design process should involve users and staff in designing solutions, and design decisions should only be made once feedback has been gathered (Ko Awatea 2022).
The term ‘consumer’ refers to anyone who has used, is currently using or is likely to use a health service. This includes but is not limited to individuals, community members, whānau and family, carers, patients and tangata whaiora. ‘Consumer’ includes voices of Māori, Pacific peoples, people living with disabilities, migrants, refugees, rainbow communities and people living in rural areas. The term resonates with some people more than others. It is important that people and communities use the language they feel most comfortable with and whichever term resonates with them.
In Aotearoa New Zealand, people have differences in health that are not only avoidable but unfair and unjust. Equity recognises different people with different levels of advantage require different approaches and resources to get equitable health outcomes.
This definition of equity comes from the Ministry of Health and was signed-off by Director General of Health, Dr Ashley Bloomfield, in March 2019.
Ko Awatea. 2022. Co Design. URL: koawatea.countiesmanukau.health.nz/co-design (accessed 18 April 2022).
For consistency, please complete the consumer engagement QSM according to the framework outlined. This does not prevent your service tailoring the framework to suit local needs. For instance, Canterbury developed a framework to introduce the QSM, and Waitematā added health literacy to the QSM framework.
The articles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi were actively engaged with at every step of the QSM’s development. The descriptors contained within each rating were developed with a Te Tiriti lens in mind (eg, understanding experiences of whānau and acting on these experiences, having a workforce reflective of your population, broad involvement of the community).
The 2020 Te Tiriti framework is one interpretation of how to further apply a Te Tiriti lens to the consumer engagement QSM and will assist when providing examples of upholding the articles of Te Tiriti at a local level. For instance, examples of active engagement with tangata whenua and demonstrating a partnership approach are more likely to be rated as a ‘partnership and shared leadership’ activity for an area if the example uploaded can demonstrate an authentic partnership. An organisation which understands and upholds the principles of Te Tiriti is more likely to demonstrate strong consumer engagement. This particular interpretation was informed by Ministry of Health guidance and the recommended principles of WAI2575.
Download a copy of the accessible transcript (65KB, docx)
Download a copy of the accessible transcript (65KB, docx)
The goal of this QSM is to address ‘what does successful consumer engagement look like, and (how) does it improve the quality and safety of services?
A framework underpinning this QSM has been developed: Supporting, Understanding, Responding and Evaluating (SURE). The SURE framework focuses on four areas:
By completing the form above, you are contributing to the ‘SURE’ framework.
There are three domains to rate:
There are four possible ratings for each domain:
1 – minimal | te itinga iho
2 – consultation | te akoako
3 – involvement | te whai wāhi
4 – partnership & shared leadership | te mahi tahi me te kaiārahitanga ngātahi
Download a detailed description for each rating (132KB, pdf).
To support your rating, there is an opportunity to comment on why a rating was chosen, and upload examples to support this rating. It is important to note that these will be available publicly.
Existing data (including demographic data) from the adult inpatient experience survey and primary care experience survey will be included with the QSM.
It is less important what the final rating is, it is more about understanding where the organisation is so that improvements can be made over time.
The pilot sites have found various ways to collect district-wide information. Each pilot site developed a form or survey to send to different services. These are available directly from the pilot sites. (see ‘buddy system’ under ‘who developed this QSM and how can I access support?’).
It is not essential to focus on every service, and this may not be practical to start with. The pilot sites did find ways to capture this information and can offer advice on how this was achieved. Counties Manukau Health developed a survey and a template for collecting organisation-wide information.
What are the principles behind this QSM?
In the development, maintenance and monitoring of this framework the following principles were developed by the consumer engagement QSM reference group:
The Health Quality & Safety Commission’s understanding of the articles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and how these are applied to our work are described below:
Kāwantanga – partnering and shared decision-making
Our work is informed and shaped equally by tangata whenua and tangata Te Tiriti worldviews and perspectives.
Tino Rangatiratanga – self-determination
We recognise the importance of tangata whenua authority and autonomy. We support tangata whenua led processes, actions and decision making, through sharing power and resources.
Ōritetanga – equity for tangata whenua
We undertake specific actions to ensure equitable outcomes for tangata whenua and we recognise that these actions can also support equitable outcomes for other groups.
Wairuatanga – upholding values, belief systems and worldviews
Tangata whenua worldviews, values and belief systems are prioritised in our work.
This QSM was developed in partnership with a QSM reference group and the Commission. The four pilot sites were Counties Manukau Health, Waitematā, Waikato and Canterbury. Please contact qsm@hqsc.govt.nz for further support.
It is possible to provide up to five examples as supporting documentation for the chosen rating. There is also ‘free text’ available to describe the rating.
If the file size is too large, there is provision to upload larger files to a file-sharing service. All uploads are stored locally. For more information contact: qsm@hqsc.govt.nz.
Co-design is an important part of a process to identify a challenge or opportunity to engage people, consumers, whānau, family and staff; to capture their experiences and ideas; to organise the learning to create new understanding and insight from the perspective of the care and emotional journey; to stay together in partnership to review learning and ideas; to plan and implement improvements; and, finally, to review the difference made (adapted from Dr Lynne Maher, Principal Co-design Counties Manukau, presentation, 2020).
Co-design is often used as an umbrella term for participatory, co-creation and open design processes. Key components of a co-design process should involve users and staff in designing solutions, and design decisions should only be made once feedback has been gathered (Ko Awatea 2022).
The term ‘consumer’ refers to anyone who has used, is currently using or is likely to use a health service. This includes but is not limited to individuals, community members, whānau and family, carers, patients and tangata whaiora. ‘Consumer’ includes voices of Māori, Pacific peoples, people living with disabilities, migrants, refugees, rainbow communities and people living in rural areas. The term resonates with some people more than others. It is important that people and communities use the language they feel most comfortable with and whichever term resonates with them.
In Aotearoa New Zealand, people have differences in health that are not only avoidable but unfair and unjust. Equity recognises different people with different levels of advantage require different approaches and resources to get equitable health outcomes.
This definition of equity comes from the Ministry of Health and was signed-off by Director General of Health, Dr Ashley Bloomfield, in March 2019.
Ko Awatea. 2022. Co Design. URL: koawatea.countiesmanukau.health.nz/co-design (accessed 18 April 2022).
For consistency, please complete the consumer engagement QSM according to the framework outlined. This does not prevent your service tailoring the framework to suit local needs. For instance, Canterbury developed a framework to introduce the QSM, and Waitematā added health literacy to the QSM framework.
The articles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi were actively engaged with at every step of the QSM’s development. The descriptors contained within each rating were developed with a Te Tiriti lens in mind (eg, understanding experiences of whānau and acting on these experiences, having a workforce reflective of your population, broad involvement of the community).
The 2020 Te Tiriti framework is one interpretation of how to further apply a Te Tiriti lens to the consumer engagement QSM and will assist when providing examples of upholding the articles of Te Tiriti at a local level. For instance, examples of active engagement with tangata whenua and demonstrating a partnership approach are more likely to be rated as a ‘partnership and shared leadership’ activity for an area if the example uploaded can demonstrate an authentic partnership. An organisation which understands and upholds the principles of Te Tiriti is more likely to demonstrate strong consumer engagement. This particular interpretation was informed by Ministry of Health guidance and the recommended principles of WAI2575.
Download a copy of the accessible transcript (65KB, docx)
Download a copy of the accessible transcript (65KB, docx)